|
 |
September 2005 # 6 |
|
The New P.E. & Sports Dimension
The column that opens your day by opening your mind
|
 |
|
“Adding Life to Years, Not Just More Years to Life" Part I – The Plight |
|
 |
John Ferguson, DA - Jim Larkin, Ph.D.
Eastern Kentucky University - USA |
|
| |
The articles of our authors are indexed in |
|
 |
| |
To start with the discussion and how to: Click here |
|
The U.S. population of older adults or those 65 years of age or more is growing at an increasing rate (Council on Aging and Adult Development, 2000; O'Neil, 2003). More older adults are living today than at any other time in the world's history and aging has, therefore, been thrust into the forefront of attention (McMurdo, 2000). In 1776, one of 50 (2%) people in America were age 65+ and more than 50% were less than 16 years of age (Schick & Schick, 1994). Currently, one of eight (12%) people are age 65+ (O'Neil, 2003). By the year 2030, the population of the United States will resemble that of modern day Florida where one in five Americans (~20%) are age 65+ (Council on Aging and Adult Development, 2000).
The growth in the older population is due to the fact that people are living longer and at the same time we are experiencing the maturation of unprecedented post world war II fertility rates, also know as the “baby boom” or those born between 1945-1965 (Blackman, Kamimoto, & Smith, 1999; McMurdo, 2000). The term “average life expectancy” is used to describe the average duration one could expect to live if born that year (Gottlieb, 2001). In 1900 the average life expectancy at birth was 46 and 48 years for males and females, respectively, in year 2000 average life expectancy was 81 and 84 years for males and females, respectively, and by year 2182, the average life expectancy will be 85 years (Gottlieb, 2001; O'Neil, 2003). Much of the increase in average life expectancy earlier in the 20 th century was due to improvements in infant mortality rate, but lately the increases have been due to treatment interventions that have decreased death rates from cardiovascular disease (Guyer, Freedman, Strobino, & Sondik, 2000; O'Neil, 2003).
“Healthy life expectancy” (also known as “active life expectancy”) is the duration of one's remaining life expected to be lived independently and in full health (Mathers, Sadana, Salomon, Murray, & Lopez, 2001). It is an important indicator of quality of life. For example, the likelihood of a non-disabled 65-year-old man and woman living to age 80 was 54% and 60%, respectively, according to Leveille, Guralnik, Ferrucci, and Langlois (1999). Leveille, Guralnik, Ferrucci, and Langlois reported the likelihood of older men and women, respectively, living from age 65 to 85 and then dying without disability was 37% and 29% in the most physically active people, and 15% and 10% in the least physically active. Of 191 countries studied, Japan leads the world in healthy life expectancy with an average of 74.5 years (Mathers, Sadana, Salomon, Murray, & Lopez, 2001). Mathers and colleagues found the United States was ranked 24th with 70.0 years of healthy life expectancy and the African country Sierra Leone was ranked last with an average of 25.9 years (primarily due to poverty, war, and AIDS). |
| Chronic Diseases (they just won’t go away) |
|
Disease during the 20th century progressed through three separate eras: (a) era of acute or infectious disease; (b) era of chronic disease; and (c) the era of senescence (Guyer, Freedman, Strobino, & Sondik, 2000). The era of acute or infectious disease existed in the early 1900's. During this time infant mortality rates were very high and the leading causes of death for all people were due to infections such as tuberculosis, smallpox, measles, influenza, diphtheria, whooping cough, scarlet fever, and typhoid (Guyer, Freedman, Strobino, & Sondik, 2000). Today most infectious diseases are curable and there has been a drastic reduction in deaths from infectious diseases (Guyer, Freedman, Strobino, & Sondik, 2000). Between the years 1900 and 1998, the percent of childhood deaths caused by infectious diseases decreased from 62% to 2% (Guyer, Freedman, Strobino, & Sondik, 2000).
We are currently in the era of chronic disease . With the near eradication of infectious diseases, chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, and stroke have become the most prevalent health problems (O'Neil, 2003). According to O'Neil (2003), about half of all disabilities among older Americans were caused by chronic disease conditions. The top causes of mortality for all adults in the United States were the following: (a) heart disease; (b) cancer; (c) cerebrovascular disease; (d) chronic lower respiratory disease; (e) accidents; (f) diabetes; (g) influenza/pneumonia; (h) Alzheimer's disease; (i) kidney disease; and (j) septicemia (Arias & Smith, 2003). Most of the diseases listed are chronic in nature. Heart disease is responsible for almost one-third of all deaths in America and has had the infamous title of being the number one cause of death for most of the 20th century (Murphy, 2000). Murphy reported that during 1910 it became the leading cause of death and has remained the top killer (with the exception of the 1918-1920 influenza pandemic). Heart disease is the number one killer of older adults within the United States (Arias & Smith, 2003). The top ten causes of death, in rank order, for people age 65+ is (a) heart disease; (b) cancer; (c) cerebrovascular disease; (d) chronic lower respiratory disease; (e) influenza/pneumonia; (f) diabetes; (g) Alzheimer's disease; (h) kidney disease; (i) accidents; and (j) septicemia (Arias & Smith, 2003). Heart disease, cancer, and stroke are responsible for 60% of all deaths in people age 65 and over (O'Neil, 2003). In all people including older adults, sedentarism is a major risk factor for heart disease (American College of Sports Medicine, 2000). Luckily, there is evidence that moderate levels of physical activity and exercise provides protection from chronic diseases such as heart disease, breast cancer, type 2 diabetes, overweight, and bone loss (DiPietro, 2001; O'Neil, 2003).
The last era of health and disease will be the era of senescence whereby the aging process itself will create the number one illness burden for our country due to the fact that there will be more people living longer. This “deficit model” of aging assumes that the aging process involves coping and adjustment to a wide variety of health-related losses especially within the physical domain (Katzko, Steverink, Dittmann-Kohli, & Herrera, 1998). |
| Quality or Quantity of Life? |
|
People age 85 are the fastest growing group of older adults and generate the greatest demand for health and long term care services (O'Neil, 2003). The percentage of this age group who rated their health as good/excellent has declined between 1982 to 1999 (O'Neil, 2003). When older people are questioned about their fears associated with aging “fear of death” is usually not cited but, instead, fears of chronic disease, pain, decreased mobility, senility, memory loss, and dependence upon other people are cited (Westerhof, Katzko, Dittmann-Kohli, & Hayslip, 2001). Issues pertaining to “quality of life” are becoming increasingly important. According to Rejeski and Mihalko (2001), quality of life is defined as a conscious cognitive judgment of satisfaction with one's life. Older adults prefer quality of life over longevity and that goal can be achieved through participation in exercise and physical activity (Rejeski & Mihalko, 2001). For example, using a survey instrument (Quality of Life after Myocardial Infarction - QLMI), cardiac rehabilitation patients reported better scores than did control subjects after 8 weeks of exercise therapy (Oldridge et al., 1998). According to Wielenga, Erdman, and Huisveld (1998), exercise helped older men with heart disease to perceive themselves as less disabled and increased their general well-being more than controls. People do not necessarily desire to have a “longer” lifespan but, instead, a “healthier” lifespan for as long as possible. This idea is congruent with the official motto of The Gerontological Society of America , “Adding life to years, not just more years to life” (Rejeski & Mihalko, 2001; p. 33). In the medical field, “quality of life” has been used synonymously with the term “health-related quality of life” or simply “health status” (Rejeski & Mihalko, 2001). Older adults desire to maintain their health status and a have a high quality of life up to the time they die. This scenario illustrates an important theoretical concept called “compression of morbidity.”
One very important goal for gerontological public health is to increase the number of years of life lived for people in a healthy non-dependent condition for as long as possible until the time of death (Bryant, Beck, & Fairclough, 2000). The theory of “compression of morbidity” states, if the age at which chronic disease increases more quickly than the increase in average life expectancy, then the time period of disability between disease onset and death is shortened or compressed (Mathers, Sadana, Salomon, Murray, & Lopez, 2001). This critical period of time is of key importance from a public health perspective because as more and more people live to old age, the job of compressing morbidity will become difficult. McMurdo (2000) stated there is evidence to show that compression of morbidity is already occurring but primarily among affluent educated older adults. Engagement in exercise is an effective means to achieve healthy outcomes in the latter years of life. Physical activity is a key factor in avoiding or shortening periods of disability prior to death in old age (DiPietro, 2001; Leveille, Guralnik, Ferrucci, & Langlois, 1999).
There are many ways of addressing health and healthy aging (Bryant, Beck, & Fairclough, 2000; Glanz, Lewis, & Rimer, 1997; U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2000). According to Edlin, Golanty, and Brown (2002), health is a multidimensional state of sound physical, mental and social well-being. Health, as defined by the World Health Organization (2003) since 1946, is a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. Health and fitness professionals believe that chronic disabling health conditions are more easily prevented than cured. Implicit within these concepts is the issue of lifestyle modification, which can be obtained through the following efforts: (a) increase behaviors that are conducive to health, (b) enhance awareness of the importance of health, and (c) promote environments that support health (Bryant, Beck, & Fairclough, 2000).
An underlying health-related goal for older people is to decrease the incidence of chronic disease and related disability, improve functional capability, and enhance quality of life. According to Healthy People 2010: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000), even in old age, lifestyle modification and changing certain lifestyle behaviors can lead to an increase in health and quality of life. According to the Surgeon General's Report on Physical Activity and Health (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996) and The State of Aging and Health in America (O'Neil, 2003), engagement in regular physical activity is important to our nation's health and is cogently related to prevention of premature morbidity, mortality, disability, and maintenance of quality of life. These reports stated that regular physical activity decreases the risk of dying from coronary heart disease, helps prevent the development of diabetes, high blood pressure, and colon cancer; and enhances mental health, bone health, and the integrity of joints, and muscles. All of these benefits are conducive to health and improvements in quality of life (O'Neil, 2003).
|
| Older Adults ® “Targets” for Exercise and Physical Activity Interventions? |
|
Both terms exercise and physical activity are similar in that they both refer to movement, contraction of skeletal muscle, and result in energy expenditure. Technically, however, there is a difference between exercise and physical activity. According to the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM, 2000), Exercise is defined as “planned, structured, and repetitive bodily movement done to improve or maintain one or more components of physical fitness (ACSM, 2000, p. 4). According to McMurdo (2000), exercise is defined as planned physical activity scheduled into the day for the purpose of achieving health and fitness benefits. Physical activity is defined as “bodily movement that is produced by the contraction of skeletal muscle and that substantially produces energy expenditure” (p. 4). The question arises, how much exercise is needed to achieve health benefits? According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) recommendations, “Every U.S. adult should accumulate 30 minutes or more of moderate-intensity physical activity on most, preferably all, days of the week” (Pate et al., 1995, p. 402). It has been found that even small increases in lifestyle physical activity in sedentary people leads to a decreased risk in cardiovascular disease and improved quality-of-life (Dunn et al., 1999). The ACSM position stand on exercise and physical activity for older adults specifically recommended that all fitness programs for older adults should incorporate endurance exercises (walking, swimming and cycling) as well as strength and flexibility training of major muscle groups in both the upper and lower extremities (Mazzeo et al., 1998). The ACSM Position Stand specifically stated that even frail and very old individuals should participate in such exercise programs.
Older adults have not been traditional primary targets for public health interventions (Blackman, Kamimoto, & Smith, 1999). According to King (2001), the scientific database addressing physical activity determinants in older adults is in its infancy. Few exercise-based studies have focused solely on older adults whereas most of the attention has been on middle-age and younger-age populations (King 2001; King, Rejeski, & Buchner, 1998). Health promotion and associated lifestyle changes are recognized to be beneficial among the older population (Modra & Black, 1999). According to King (2001, p.36), “...some insights related to factors that may influence physical activity participation by older adults are beginning to emerge.” It is in the older adult (and pre-senior) age groups that the greatest benefits from engagement in exercise and health promotive interventions are to occur (Arent, Landers, & Etnier, 2000). According to O'Neil (2003), “...Older people have more to gain than younger people by becoming more active because they are at higher risk of developing problems that regular physical activity can prevent, such as obesity, high blood pressure, diabetes, osteoporosis, stroke, depression, colon cancer, and premature death” (p. 5). These researchers emphasized that even small changes made by the older population will yield large differences in health and economic burden and, therefore, seniors are considered to be an ideal target group for health promotion interventions. According to the American College of Sport Medicine's Position Stand on Exercise and Physical Activity for Older Adults (Mazzeo et al., 1998), “...the benefits associated with regular exercise and physical activity contribute to a more healthy, independent lifestyle, greatly improving the functional capacity and quality of life for the fastest growing segment of our population (seniors)” (p. 1003). Guralnik, Leveille, Volpato, Marx, and Cohen-Mansfield (2003) endorse the concept of screening non-disabled older adults within a given population to identify individuals who are at a high risk of disability so that they can be specifically recruited into exercise interventions. |
Aging, as defined by Spirduso, Francis, and MacRae (2005), is a continuous process within all living things that, with the passage of time, leads ultimately to losses in adaptability and functional ability. Aging rarely causes death but, instead, death is due to the body losing its capacity to withstand internal or external stressors. Disease and age-related physical decline do not have to be inevitable consequences of aging (Blackman, Kamimoto, & Smith, 1999). Exercise provides a coping mechanism and a way to adapt to stressors as humans age. Exercise has an ameliorating effect on cardiovascular health, obesity, blood profiles, osteoporosis, psychological well-being, and functional ability (Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2001). Functional ability, health, wellness and disability of older people are modifiable and great gains can be achieved by promoting health and fitness in the older adult population (Allaire, et al., 1999; DiPietro, 2001). Functional independence is defined as the ability to conduct activities of daily living without difficulty and the attributes that lead to functional decline with aging such as decreased strength, muscle mass, aerobic capacity, and balance are reversible or modifiable even within the frail elderly population (Fiatarone, 1996).
Walking ability and participation in exercise or physical activity is integral to the independence of older people. According to Leveille, Guralnik, Ferrucci, and Langlois (1999), physical activity was a key factor that increased the likelihood of avoiding disability prior to death in old age and independence within seniors is closely tied with two factors, manipulation skills and locomotion skills, with walking ability being the most important locomotion skill. “Stay strong and live long” was the message that Davis, Ross, Preston, Nevitt, and Wasnich (1998) took away from their study of older women. They showed that greater levels of physical activity, greater strength, and lower body mass index were all associated with improved performance of activities of daily living. The physically active older adult has an advantage over those who are sedentary.
According to Fiatarone et al. (1990), strength training done over an 8-week period had beneficial results in 10 frail elderly subjects (age 86-96). In their study only the knee extensor muscles were trained. Quadricep strength improved 177%, improvements in independence and mobility occurred, two subjects eliminated the use of their walking canes, and one wheelchair-bound subject was able to rise from a wheelchair without using their arms. Ironically, 90% of frail institutionalized elderly are not provided therapeutic exercise programming (Council on Aging and Adult Development, 2000). Sedentary older adults typically have decreased exercise tolerance and are living below, at, or slightly above their threshold of physical ability (Malbut-Shennan & Young, 1999). A minor illness is all that is needed to render them fully dependent upon others whereas physically active elders have a “cushion” to help them get through their setbacks (Laukkanen, Kauppinen, and Heikkinen, 1998; McMurdo, 2000). Exercise can produce drastic improvements in functions essential during old age and postpone physical deterioration for perhaps 10-20 years (Malbut-Shennan, & Young, 1999). Twin cohort studies have shown physically active twins were 29-43% less likely to die prematurely than their sedentary counterpart (Kujala, Kaprio, Sarna, & Koskenvuo, 1998).
If we are to successfully deal with the aging of America, health and fitness professionals must find practical ways to make our older citizens well. As the research above has shown, appropriate levels of exercise and physical activity in older adults will help make them “well” and enhance their health, function, and independence. One of the highest priorities in the field of health promotion is the acquisition of physical fitness for all age groups including the older adult population (Andrews, 2001). |
| Use It or Lose It: Sedentarism in Older Adults |
|
Since the time of Hippocrates (460-370 B.C.) the danger of sedentarism and benefits of exercise have been known. Hippocrates stated, “If we could give every individual the right amount of nourishment and exercise, not too little and not too much, we would have found the safest way to health” (Berryman, 2000). If health and independence are integral to achieve a high quality of life and physical activity is a necessary requirement, one might surmise that older adults would be highly committed to engagement in exercise. On the contrary, in the United States it appears that with increasing age comes a decrease in levels of exercise and physical activity (Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2001). According to O'Neil (2003), in the year 2000 on average 35% of all older adults reported no physical activity during their leisure time. The state by state report card indicated all states failed to meet the year 2000 leisure time physical activity target goal of 22.0% participation with Utah ranking 1 st and Kentucky ranking 51 st at 22.4% and 50.4%, respectively (O'Neil, 2003). Crespo, Ainsworth, Keteyian, Heath, and Smit (1999) showed the prevalence of physical inactivity does indeed increase with advancing age. They found over one-fourth, one-third, and one-half of the people were completely sedentary in the age groups 60-69, 70-79, and 80+ years, respectively (see Table 1 ). Additionally, females had higher prevalence rates of sedentary behavior than males in all age categories ranging from 20-29 through 80+ years of age.
Table 1
Prevalence Rates of Adult (Age 20 -80+) Sedentary Behavior
|
Total |
Males |
Females |
Age (yrs) |
N % / SE |
N % / SE |
N % / SE |
20-29 |
3783 17 % / 0.8 |
1801 13 % / 1.2 |
1982 21 % / 1.5 |
30-39 |
3594 20 % / 1.3 |
1620 15 % / 1.8 |
1974 24 % / 1.5 |
40-49 |
2794 22 % / 1.3 |
1325 17 % / 1.3 |
1469 27 % / 2.0 |
50-59 |
2058 25 % / 1.6 |
953 19 % / 2.0 |
1105 30 % / 1.8 |
60-69 |
2608 26 % / 1.5 |
1298 19 % / 1.7 |
1310 31 % / 1.7 |
70-79 |
2156 34 % / 2.0 |
993 24 % / 2.1 |
1163 41 % / 2.3 |
80+ |
1832 51 % / 2.4 |
826 38 % / 2.3 |
1006 58 % / 2.9 |
Total a |
18825 23 % / 0.9 |
8816 17 % / 1.0 |
1009 28 % / 1.0 |
Note. Data modified from Crespo, Ainsworth, Keteyian, Heath, and Smit (1999). All data are age-adjusted.
Pratt, Macera, and Blanton (1999) found that sedentarism increased for males with increasing age and at 65 and 75 years of age the percentage of men who were sedentary was 32% and 37%, respectively. These same researchers found that sedentarism generally increased for females as well when they found at 65 and 75 years of age the percentage of women who were sedentary was 36% and 47%, respectively. Pratt, Macera, and Blanton (1999) showed that levels of recommended leisure time physical activity were highest in men during young adulthood, decreased during middle age, and increased again at retirement age but this effect was absent in women. It was concluded by Pratt and colleagues that there was perhaps less social acceptance of physical activity for older women compared to men. |
| Recruitment Issues and Concerns |
|
It is important to gain an understanding of what exercise-related behaviors older adults engage in and the reasons or motivations for their behaviors (American College of Sports Medicine, 2000). “Demonstrating that exercise can be beneficial is less difficult than persuading people to be more physically active” (McMurdo, 2000, p. 2). Behaviors associated with health promotion, such as exercise and physical activity, are notoriously resistant to planned recruitment interventions (Susser, 1995). According to the Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996), one important goal for the nation is to develop ways to recruit participants to exercise programs or to encourage freestanding or unstructured physical activity. Dr. Karl Stoedefalke, founder of the American College of Sports Medicine, stated that exercise professionals must study and learn what factors motivate older adults to engage in regular exercise (Council on Aging and Adult Development, 2000). By understanding the factors related to physical activity status in seniors, it is possible to develop more effective interventions for promoting regular physical activity (King, 2001). Unfortunately, few exercise-based studies have focused solely on older adults and their motivations behind physical fitness or physical activity (King, 2001). McMurdo (2000) stated more research efforts are needed to study factors that would motivate the senior population to adopt a healthy lifestyle. King (2001) made several recommendations about prioritizing and conceptualizing physical activity and exercise promotion in older adults (see Table 2 ).
Table 2
Major Issues Within Physical Activity Promotion in Older Adults
Personal
Characteristics |
Program-based
Factors |
Environmental
Factors |
How do demographics relate to physical activity? |
What type of physical activities appeal to older adults? |
Are socially supportive environments important? |
Do past experiences or myths relate to current behaviors? |
How does intensity level affect physical activity participation? |
Does the “source” of support make a difference? |
Is physical appearance related to participation activity? |
Is convenience/location related to participation? |
Are environmental cues or prompts a factor? |
What incentives exist for improving health and fitness? |
Are structured or un-structured programs preferred? |
How does ease of access to facilities affect participation? |
What perceived barriers and incentives exist? |
What format of programming is preferred? |
What environmental factors exist? |
Do self-efficacy and self-motivation play a role? |
Is self-consciousness and social embarrassment a factor? |
a |
Are medical problems and fear of injury a factor? |
a |
a |
Note. This information adapted from King (2001). |
| Where Do We Go from Here? |
|
Unfortunately, not enough research has been done on aging and exercise. Lidor, Miller, and Rotstein (1999) concluded that less than 5% of all studies in exercise science journals addressed seniors. Older Americans should be a primary target audience for increasing levels of exercise (Arent, Landers, & Etnier, 2000). According to Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996), physical activity needs to receive the same attention as other important public health issues that impact the nation such as nutrition, alcohol abuse, and tobacco use.
The evidence clearly indicates that sedentary behavior is strongly linked to chronic disease morbidity and mortality and represents a major avoidable risk factor for illness in our country (DiPietro, 2001; O'Neil, 2003). Within the United States, the direct costs of sedentarism are estimated to be 24 billion dollars, or 2.4% of all healthcare expenditures (Colditz, 1999). The costs of sedentary behavior combined with the increasing number of older adults by the year 2030 will present a tremendous burden to the country financially and in human suffering (Colditz, 1999; O'Neil, 2003). We need to take greater initiative to increase active lifestyles among older adults (Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2001).
|
Allaire, S., LaValley, M., Evans, S., O'Connor, G., Kelly-Hayes, M., & Meenan, R. (1999). Evidence for decline in disability and improved health among persons aged 55 to 70 years: The Framingham heart study. American Journal of Public Health, 89 , 1678-1683.
American College of Sports Medicine. (2000). ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (6th Ed.). Media, PA: Williams & Wilkins.
Andrews, G. (2001). Care of older people: Promoting health and function in an aging population. British Medical Journal, 322 , 728-730.
Arent, S, Landers, D., & Etnier, J. (2000). The effects of exercise on mood in older adults: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 8 , 407-430.
Arias, E., & Smith, B. (2003). Deaths: Preliminary data for 2001. National Vital Statistics Reports, 51 , 4-27.
Berryman, J. (2000). Exercise science and sports medicine: A rich history. Sports Medicine Bulletin, 35 , 8-9.
Blackman, D., Kamimoto, L., & Smith, S. (1999). Overview: Surveillance for selected public health indicators affecting older adults – United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 48 , 1-6.
Bryant, L., Beck, A., & Fairclough, D. (2000). Factors that contribute to positive perceived health in an older population. Journal of Aging and Health, 12 , 169-193.
Colditz, G. (1999). Economic costs of obesity and inactivity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31 , Suppl., S663-S667.
Council on Aging and Adult Development. (2000). CAAD in Orlando: Motivating older adults to exercise a key theme. Connection, 6 , 2.
Crespo, C., Ainsworth, B., Keteyian, S., Heath, G., & Smit, E. (1999). Prevalence of physical inactivity and its relation to social class in U.S. adults: Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31 , 1821-1827.
Davis, J., Ross, P., Preston, S., Nevitt, M., & Wasnich, R. (1998). Strength, physical activity, and body mass index: Relationship to performance-based measures and activities of daily living among older Japanese women in Hawaii. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46 , 274-279.
DiPietro, L. (2001). Physical activity in aging: Changes in patterns and their relationship to health and function. Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 56A , 13-22.
Dunn, A., Marcus, B., Kampert, J., Garcia, M., Kohl, H., & Blair, S. (1999). Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281 , 327-334.
Edlin, G., Golanty, E., & Brown, K. (2002). Health and wellness (7 th Ed.) . Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
Fiatarone, M. (1996). Physical activity and functional independence in aging. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67 , 70.
Fiatarone, M., Marks, E., Ryan, N., Meredith, C., Lipsitz, L., & Evans, W. (1990). High-intensity strength training in nonagenarians. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263 , 3029-3034.
Glanz, K., Lewis, F., & Rimer, B. (1997). Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Gottlieb, S. (2001). Increases in life expectancy likely to be smaller in future. British Medical Journal, 322 , 512-513.
Guralnik, J., Leveille, S., Volpato, S., Marx, M., & Cohen-Mansfield, J. (2003). Targeting high-risk older adults into exercise programs for disability prevention. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 11 , 219-229.
Guyer, B., Freedman, M., Strobino, D., & Sondik, E. (2000). Annual summary of vital statistics: Trends in the health of Americans during the 20th Century. Pediatrics, 106 , 1307-1318.
Katzko, M., Steverink, N., Dittmann-Kohli, F., & Herrera, R. (1998). The self-concept of the elderly: A cross cultural comparison. Journal of Aging and Human development, 46 , 171-187.
King, A. (2001). Interventions to promote physical activity by older adults. Journals of Gerontology: SERIES A, 56A , 36-46.
King, A., Rejeski, W., & Buchner, D. (1998). Physical activity interventions targeting older adults: A critical review and recommendations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 15 , 316-333.
Kujala, U., Kaprio, J., Sarna, S., & Koskenvuo, M. (1998). Relationship of leisure-time physical activity and mortality: The Finnish twin cohort. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279 , 440-444.
Laukkanen, P., Kauppinen, M., & Heikkinen, E. (1998). Physical activity as a predictor of health and disability in 75- and 80-year-old men and women: A 5-year longitudinal study. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 6 , 141-156.
Leveille, S., Guralnik, J., Ferrucci, L., & Langlois, J. (1999). Aging successfully until death in old age: Opportunities for increasing active life expectancy. American Journal of Epidemiology, 149 , 654-664.
Lidor, R., Miller, U., & Rotstein, A. (1999). Is research on aging and physical activity really increasing? A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 7 , 182-195.
Malbut-Shennan, K., & Young, A. (1999). The physiology of physical performance and training in old age. Coronary Artery Disease, 10 , 37-42.
Mathers, C., Sadana, R., Salomon, J., Murray, C., & Lopez, A. (2001). Healthy life expectancy in 191 countries. Lancet, 357 , 1685-1692.
Mazzeo, R., Cavanagh, P., Evans, W., Fiatarone, M., Hagberg, J., McAuley, E., & Startzell, J. (1998). American College of Sports Medicine position stand on exercise and physical activity for older adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 30 , 992-1008.
McMurdo, M. (2000). A healthy old age: Realistic or futile goal? British Medical Journal, 321 , 1149-1151.
Modra, A., & Black, D. (1999). Peer-led minimal intervention: An effective exercise approach for elderly women? American Journal of Health Behavior, 23 , 52-60.
Murphy, S. (2000). Deaths: Final data for 1998: National vital statistics report. National Center for Health Statistics, 48 , #11.
Oldridge, N., Gottlieb, M., Guyatt, G., Jones, N., Streiner, D., & Feeny, D. (1998). Predictors of health-related quality of life with cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 18 , 95-103.
O'Neil, G. (2003). The state of aging and health in America. The Gerontological Society of America . Merck Institute of Aging and Health.
Pate, R., Pratt, M., Blair, S., Haskell, W., Macera, C., Bouchard, C., Buchner, D., Ettinger, W., Heath, G., King, A., Kriska, A., Leon, A., Marcus, B., Morris, J., Paffenbarger, R., Patrick, K., Pollock, M., Rippe, J., Sallis, & Wilmore, J. (1995). Physical activity and public health: A recommendation from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273 , 402-407.
Pratt, M., Macera, C., & Blanton, C. (1999). Levels of physical activity in children and adults in the United States: Current evidence and research issues. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31 , Suppl., S526-S533.
Rejeski, W., & Mihalko, S. (2001). Physical activity and quality of life in older adults. Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 56A , 23-35.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (2001). National Blueprint: Increasing Physical Activity Among Adults Age 50 and Older . Princeton, NJ.
Schick, F. & Schick, R. (1994). Statistical handbook on aging Americans . Phoenix, AZ: The Onyx Press.
Spirduso, W., Francis, K., & MacRae, P. (2005). Physical dimensions of aging (2 nd Ed.) . Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Susser, M. (1995). The tribulations of trials: Interventions in communities. American Journal of Public Health, 85 , 156-158.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1996). Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General . Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy people 2010: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives (www.health.gov/healthypeople).
Westerhof, G., Katzko, M., Dittmann-Kohli, F., & Hayslip, B. (2001). Life contexts and health-related selves in old age. Journal of Aging Studies, 15 , 105-127.
Wielenga, R., Erdman, R. & Huisveld, I. (1998). Effect of exercise training on quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 45 , 459-464.
World Health Organization. (2003, July 6). WHO definition of health. Retrieved July 6, 2003, from http://www.who.int/about/definition.html |
1. Is physical inactivity among the elderly population a concern in your country?
2. What are some of the barriers or “excuses” which this population seems to offer in your area or region?
3. What interventions have you found to be effective with this population?
4. What might be done to better “market” physical activity for the elderly?
5. What positive “role models” or innovative programs have you encountered for the elderly?
|
First copy the above questions ( you'll paste them into the reply form of the discussion forum) and then ...
Just click onto this link
|
October 2005 - Dr. Chris Cushion will start with a new article.
Have a good discussion,
co-ordinator
Guy Van Damme
|